The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004222.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodie M Dodd, Marianna R Dare, Philippa Middleton |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2008.
All research outputs
#8,875,607
of 26,206,339 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,782
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,132
of 76,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,206,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.