↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004222.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodie M Dodd, Marianna R Dare, Philippa Middleton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 57 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 61 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2008.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,660
of 75,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.