The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in patients presenting with low‐back pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008643.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher M Williams, Nicholas Henschke, Christopher G Maher, Maurits W van Tulder, Bart W Koes, Petra Macaskill, Les Irwig |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 10 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 21 | 25% |
Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 41% |
Unspecified | 9 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,121,801
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,308
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,392
of 388,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.