The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007784.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J Tunnicliffe, Suetonia C Palmer, Brydee A Cashmore, Valeria M Saglimbene, Rathika Krishnasamy, Kelly Lambert, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni Fm Strippoli |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,396,808
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,767
of 13,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,703
of 397,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.