↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intranasal ipratropium bromide for the common cold

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Intranasal ipratropium bromide for the common cold
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008231.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zaina H AlBalawi, Sahar S Othman, Khalid AlFaleh

Abstract

The common cold is one of the most common illnesses in humans and constitutes an economic burden both in terms of productivity and expenditure for treatment. There is no proven cure for the common cold and symptomatic relief is the mainstay of treatment. The use of intranasal ipratropium bromide (IB) has been addressed in several studies and might prove an effective treatment for the common cold.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,626,144
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,472
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,506
of 209,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.