The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Intranasal ipratropium bromide for the common cold
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008231.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zaina H AlBalawi, Sahar S Othman, Khalid AlFaleh |
Abstract |
The common cold is one of the most common illnesses in humans and constitutes an economic burden both in terms of productivity and expenditure for treatment. There is no proven cure for the common cold and symptomatic relief is the mainstay of treatment. The use of intranasal ipratropium bromide (IB) has been addressed in several studies and might prove an effective treatment for the common cold. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 33% |
Ecuador | 1 | 17% |
Pakistan | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 150 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
Researcher | 17 | 11% |
Other | 16 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
Other | 33 | 22% |
Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
Psychology | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,717,561
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,475
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,749
of 211,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.