↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium and vitamin D for corticosteroid‐induced osteoporosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Calcium and vitamin D for corticosteroid‐induced osteoporosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 1998
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Homik, Maria E Suarez‐Almazor, Beverley Shea, Ann Cranney, George A Wells, Peter Tugwell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Other 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 46 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 59 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#835,715
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,608
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264
of 33,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.