↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium and vitamin D for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Calcium and vitamin D for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 1998
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Homik, Maria E Suarez-Almazor, Beverley Shea, Ann Cranney, George A Wells, Peter Tugwell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 12%
Other 13 10%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 23 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#662,341
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,670
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,495
of 163,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.