The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for toxic epidermal necrolysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001435 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samit Majumdar, Maja Mockenhaupt, Jean‐Claude Roujeau, Askari P Townshend |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,479,689
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,869
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,702
of 51,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.