The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008145.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela Oyo-Ita, Olabisi Oduwole, Dachi Arikpo, Emmanuel E Effa, Ekpereonne B Esu, Yusentha Balakrishna, Moriam T Chibuzor, Chioma M Oringanje, Chukwuemeka E Nwachukwu, Charles S Wiysonge, Martin M Meremikwu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 84% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 61 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 63 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,855,560
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,769
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,244
of 386,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.