↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Decentralised versus centralised governance of health services

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Decentralised versus centralised governance of health services
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010830.pub2
Authors

Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy, Tamysetty Sathyanarayana

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Lecturer 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 24 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 25 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,529,987
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,729
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,300
of 354,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.