↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012515
Authors

Shahin Sayed, Anthony Ngugi, Powell Ochieng, Aruyaru S Mwenda, Rehana A Salam

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 14 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,437,553
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,810
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,967
of 419,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#260
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.