↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012515
Authors

Shahin Sayed, Anthony Ngugi, Powell Ochieng, Aruyaru S Mwenda, Rehana A Salam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,163,301
of 26,184,895 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,451
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,958
of 427,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#254
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.