↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012515
Authors

Shahin Sayed, Anthony Ngugi, Powell Ochieng, Aruyaru S Mwenda, Rehana A Salam

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 14 16%
Unspecified 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 19%
Unspecified 8 9%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,211
of 12,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,871
of 421,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#257
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.