↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012515
Authors

Shahin Sayed, Anthony Ngugi, Powell Ochieng, Aruyaru S Mwenda, Rehana A Salam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,642,835
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,686
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,117
of 423,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#225
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.