↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Operative procedures for fissure in ano

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Operative procedures for fissure in ano
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002199.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard L Nelson, Arpita Chattopadhyay, William Brooks, Isobel Platt, Thumri Paavana, Sophie Earl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,867,151
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,353
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,324
of 365,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.