| Title |
Erythromycin for the prevention and treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001815.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eugene Ng, Vibhuti S Shah |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 170 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 45 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,990
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,503
of 81,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.