↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Closed reduction methods for treating distal radial fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Closed reduction methods for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003763
Authors

Helen HG Handoll, Rajan Madhok

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 22%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 12 9%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 29 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,453,651
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,037
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,731
of 329,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.