↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Methods for informing people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease of their diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Methods for informing people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease of their diagnosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007593
Authors

Paolo Bongioanni, Gian Domenico Borasio, David Oliver, Francesco Tramonti, Andrea Romagnoli, Karl P Kapitza

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 19%
Psychology 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,990
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,719
of 171,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.