↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuron disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuron disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004302.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Bongioanni, Camilla Reali, Valeria Sogos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,223
of 59,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.