↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
543 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010216.pub8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Lindson, Ailsa R Butler, Hayden McRobbie, Chris Bullen, Peter Hajek, Rachna Begh, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Tari Turner, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Tom Morris, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 543 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 20 18%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 46 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 22 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Psychology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 50 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 715. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#30,247
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#579
of 380,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.