| Title |
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010216.pub8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Lindson, Ailsa R Butler, Hayden McRobbie, Chris Bullen, Peter Hajek, Rachna Begh, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Tari Turner, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Tom Morris, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 498 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 10% |
| Australia | 48 | 10% |
| Mexico | 29 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 5% |
| Spain | 18 | 4% |
| Canada | 16 | 3% |
| France | 12 | 2% |
| Germany | 11 | 2% |
| India | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 60 | 12% |
| Unknown | 218 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 444 | 89% |
| Scientists | 29 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#45,400
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#786
of 361,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.