↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013295.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria N Gibbs, Rita Champaneria, Josie Sandercock, Nicky J Welton, Louise J Geneen, Susan J Brunskill, Carolyn Dorée, Catherine Kimber, Antony Jr Palmer, Lise J Estcourt

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 15 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,796,257
of 26,609,881 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,229
of 13,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,201
of 387,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,609,881 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.