↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gabapentin or pregabalin for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Gabapentin or pregabalin for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mattias Linde, Wim M Mulleners, Edward P Chronicle, Douglas C McCrory

Abstract

Some antiepileptic drugs but not others are useful in clinical practice for the prophylaxis of migraine. This might be explained by the variety of actions of these drugs in the central nervous system. The present review is part of an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004, and previously updated (conclusions not changed) in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 59 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 63 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#878,568
of 21,641,192 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,969
of 12,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,369
of 174,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,641,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.