↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gabapentin or pregabalin for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Gabapentin or pregabalin for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mattias Linde, Wim M Mulleners, Edward P Chronicle, Douglas C McCrory

Abstract

Some antiepileptic drugs but not others are useful in clinical practice for the prophylaxis of migraine. This might be explained by the variety of actions of these drugs in the central nervous system. The present review is part of an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004, and previously updated (conclusions not changed) in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 185 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 44 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#668,826
of 17,379,776 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,679
of 11,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,638
of 163,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,379,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.