↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese medicinal herbs for cholelithiasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Chinese medicinal herbs for cholelithiasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004547.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Gan, Jun Chen, Shuli J Jin, Yiping Wang

Abstract

Cholelithiasis is a common disease of the biliary tract. Chinese medicinal herbs are being used widely as an alternative treatment in people with cholelithiasis, but their beneficial or harmful effects have not been assessed systematically.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 29 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2017.
All research outputs
#16,053,607
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,990
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,592
of 205,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#246
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.