↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000493.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinita Gurung, Michael Stokes, Philippa Middleton, Stephen J Milan, William Hague, Jim G Thornton

Abstract

Obstetric cholestasis has been linked to adverse maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes. As the pathophysiology is poorly understood, therapies have been empiric. The first version of this review, published in 2001, and including nine randomised controlled trials involving 227 women, concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend any of the interventions alone or in combination. This is the first update.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 247 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 16%
Student > Bachelor 38 15%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Other 21 8%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Psychology 18 7%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 47 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,935,590
of 22,075,848 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,580
of 12,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,350
of 174,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,075,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.