↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
676 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003586.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audrey Bowen, Christine Hazelton, Alex Pollock, Nadina B Lincoln

Abstract

Unilateral spatial neglect causes difficulty attending to one side of space. Various rehabilitation interventions have been used but evidence of their benefit is lacking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 676 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 660 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 135 20%
Researcher 91 13%
Student > Bachelor 80 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 8%
Other 147 22%
Unknown 91 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 22%
Psychology 131 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 109 16%
Neuroscience 52 8%
Social Sciences 28 4%
Other 94 14%
Unknown 112 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,134,819
of 17,606,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,929
of 11,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,417
of 164,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,606,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.