↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cernilton for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Cernilton for benign prostatic hyperplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001042.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy J Wilt, Roderick MacDonald, Areef Ishani, Indy Rutks, Gerold Stark

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,990
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,703
of 110,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.