The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Factors influencing the implementation of early discharge hospital at home and admission avoidance hospital at home: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014765.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason A Wallis, Sasha Shepperd, Petra Makela, Jia Xi Han, Evie M Tripp, Emma Gearon, Gary Disher, Rachelle Buchbinder, Denise O'Connor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 20 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 19 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,993,317
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,089
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,037
of 352,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.