↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002303.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Andreia de Moraes Silva, Andrea Nelson, Sally Em Bell-Syer, Seleno G de Jesus-Silva, Fausto Miranda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,341,429
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,707
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,312
of 336,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.