↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological agents for preventing morbidity associated with the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological agents for preventing morbidity associated with the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004087.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fauzia A Khan, Hameed Ullah

Abstract

Several drugs have been used in attenuating or obliterating the response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. These changes are of little concern in relatively healthy patients but can lead to morbidity and mortality in the high risk patient population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 33 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,068,384
of 18,846,954 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,323
of 11,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,368
of 167,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,846,954 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.