The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Community views on active case finding for tuberculosis in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014756.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Taylor, Nancy Medley, Susanna S van Wyk, Sandy Oliver |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Malawi | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 44% |
| Scientists | 12 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,166,609
of 26,369,011 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,233
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,156
of 351,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,369,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.