| Title |
Inhaled bronchodilators for the prevention and treatment of chronic lung disease in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003214.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geraldine Ng, Matteo Bruschettini, John Ibrahim, Orlando da Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Botswana | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 8 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 41% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,120,006
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,322
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,940
of 338,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.