| Title |
Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007157.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mayssoon Dashash, C Albert Yeung, Issam Jamous, Anthony Blinkhorn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 21% |
| Canada | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 32% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 245 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 79 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 42% |
| Psychology | 14 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 89 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,088,100
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,303
of 13,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,254
of 211,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.