↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007157.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mayssoon Dashash, C Albert Yeung, Issam Jamous, Anthony Blinkhorn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 255 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 88 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 41%
Psychology 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 98 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,035,371
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,182
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,587
of 212,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.