↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007157.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mayssoon Dashash, C Albert Yeung, Issam Jamous, Anthony Blinkhorn

Abstract

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a tooth development disorder in which the teeth are covered with thin, abnormally formed enamel. This enamel is easily fractured and damaged, which affects the appearance of the teeth, especially if left untreated. Negative psychological outcomes, due to compromised appearance and function, in patients with AI, have been found to compromise a person's attractiveness and reduce social interaction. The treatment used depends on the severity of the problem.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 47%
Psychology 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 47 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,363,394
of 19,144,306 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,367
of 11,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,935
of 168,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,144,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.