| Title |
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010814.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ping Sun, Xiang Cheng, Shichang Deng, Qinggang Hu, Yi Sun, Qichang Zheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 63 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 71 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,744
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,091
of 428,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#203
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.