↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009101.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Susan O'Meara, Sohan Deshpande, Katharine Speak

Abstract

Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from including hydrogel dressings. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 324 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 16%
Student > Bachelor 52 16%
Researcher 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Other 18 6%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 81 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 92 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,091,108
of 21,347,367 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,633
of 12,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,188
of 174,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.