↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009101.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Susan O'Meara, Sohan Deshpande, Katharine Speak

Abstract

Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from including hydrogel dressings. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 256 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Student > Bachelor 44 17%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Other 17 7%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 57 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,677,403
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,150
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,879
of 163,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.