↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
409 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009101.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Susan O'Meara, Sohan Deshpande, Katharine Speak

Abstract

Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from including hydrogel dressings. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 407 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 14%
Student > Master 52 13%
Researcher 34 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Other 21 5%
Other 78 19%
Unknown 137 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 149 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,712,474
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,412
of 12,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,431
of 204,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 330 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 330 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.