↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003907.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicoline BM Voet, Elly L van der Kooi, Ingrid I Riphagen, Eline Lindeman, Baziel GM van Engelen, Alexander CH Geurts

Abstract

Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning in people with a muscle disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 232 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 17%
Sports and Recreations 24 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 55 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,233,801
of 21,347,367 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,844
of 12,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,448
of 174,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.