↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
Title
Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003907.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicoline BM Voet, Elly L van der Kooi, Ingrid I Riphagen, Eline Lindeman, Baziel GM van Engelen, Alexander CH Geurts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 256 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 63 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 15%
Sports and Recreations 25 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 74 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,249,546
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,012
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,543
of 206,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#159
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.