↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
Title
Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003907.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicoline BM Voet, Elly L van der Kooi, Ingrid I Riphagen, Eline Lindeman, Baziel GM van Engelen, Alexander CH Geurts

Abstract

Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning in people with a muscle disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 238 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 17%
Sports and Recreations 24 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 55 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,593,136
of 18,200,907 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,884
of 11,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,499
of 166,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,200,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.