↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Postpartum misoprostol for preventing maternal mortality and morbidity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Postpartum misoprostol for preventing maternal mortality and morbidity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008982.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Justus Hofmeyr, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Natalia Novikova, Theresa A Lawrie

Abstract

The primary objective of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) prevention and treatment is to reduce maternal deaths. Misoprostol has the major public health advantage over injectable medication that it can more easily be distributed at community level. Because misoprostol might have adverse effects unrelated to blood loss which might impact on mortality or severe morbidity, it is important to continue surveillance of all relevant evidence from randomised trials. This is particularly important as misoprostol is being introduced on a large scale for PPH prevention in low-income countries, and is commonly used for PPH treatment in well-resourced settings as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 85 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 13%
Social Sciences 23 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Psychology 4 1%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 92 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,462,820
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,121
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,201
of 206,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.