↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Peer support telephone calls for improving health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
465 Mendeley
Title
Peer support telephone calls for improving health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006903.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy Dale, Isabela O Caramlau, Antje Lindenmeyer, Susan M Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 452 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 14%
Researcher 57 12%
Student > Bachelor 55 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 11%
Other 18 4%
Other 84 18%
Unknown 135 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 12%
Psychology 52 11%
Social Sciences 37 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 148 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,857,628
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,973
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,932
of 102,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.