↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Peer support telephone calls for improving health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
Title
Peer support telephone calls for improving health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006903.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy Dale, Isabela O Caramlau, Antje Lindenmeyer, Susan M Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 332 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 19%
Researcher 55 16%
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 53 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 14%
Psychology 45 13%
Social Sciences 38 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 63 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,372,770
of 17,446,661 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,013
of 11,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,373
of 367,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,446,661 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.