The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Perioperative antibiotics for prevention of acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006364.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily W Gower, Kristina Lindsley, Samantha E Tulenko, Afshan A Nanji, Ilya Leyngold, Peter J McDonnell |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 278 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 58 | 21% |
| Unknown | 93 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 106 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,400,494
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,854
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,875
of 435,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.