| Title |
Anti‐TNF‐α treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008088.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
DongHao Lu, Huan Song, Gang Shi |
| Abstract |
Endometriosis is a chronic, recurring condition that can develop during the reproductive years. It is characterised by the development of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is the most common cause of pelvic pain in women. This endometrial tissue development is dependent on oestrogen produced primarily by the ovaries and, therefore, traditional management has focused on suppression of ovarian function. Mounting evidence shows that altered immune function plays a crucial role in the genesis and development of endometriosis. In this review we considered modulation of the inflammation as an alternative approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 67 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 71 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,401,178
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,678
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,826
of 210,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.