The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Anti‐TNF‐α treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008088.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
DongHao Lu, Huan Song, Gang Shi |
| Abstract |
Endometriosis is a chronic, recurring condition that can develop during the reproductive years. It is characterised by the development of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is the most common cause of pelvic pain in women. This endometrial tissue development is dependent on oestrogen produced primarily by the ovaries and, therefore, traditional management has focused on suppression of ovarian function. Mounting evidence shows that altered immune function plays a crucial role in the genesis and development of endometriosis. In this review we considered modulation of the inflammation as an alternative approach. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,762,493
of 26,626,316 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,165
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,102
of 213,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.