↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti‐TNF‐α treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Anti‐TNF‐α treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008088.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

DongHao Lu, Huan Song, Gang Shi

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic, recurring condition that can develop during the reproductive years. It is characterised by the development of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is the most common cause of pelvic pain in women. This endometrial tissue development is dependent on oestrogen produced primarily by the ovaries and, therefore, traditional management has focused on suppression of ovarian function. Mounting evidence shows that altered immune function plays a crucial role in the genesis and development of endometriosis. In this review we considered modulation of the inflammation as an alternative approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 224 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Other 17 7%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 63 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Psychology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 67 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,357,904
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,031
of 12,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,531
of 206,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.