↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine for initial treatment of HIV infection and AIDS

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Co-formulated abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine for initial treatment of HIV infection and AIDS
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005481.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muki S Shey, Eugene J Kongnyuy, Samuel M Alobwede, Charles S Wiysonge

Abstract

UNAIDS estimates that 34 million people are currently living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) worldwide. Currently recommended regimens for initiating HIV treatment consist of either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). However, there may be some patients for whom NNRTIs and PIs may not be appropriate. This is an update of the review published in the Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Psychology 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 38 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,172,390
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,385
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,849
of 197,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#179
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.