↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008370.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Rahul Koti, Giuseppe Fusai, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

Pancreatic resections are associated with high morbidity (30% to 60%) and mortality (5%). Synthetic analogues of somatostatin are advocated by some surgeons to reduce complications following pancreatic surgery; however, their use is controversial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 59 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 65 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,841
of 204,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#224
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.