Industry sponsorship and research. https://t.co/UjI4e8T5BE @CochraneUK @CochraneLibrary @First10EM @JeanneLenzer1
@ZoiNetou @StrokeDoc2 @DavidJuurlink fCOI do not make results and conclusions wrong but it should increase our skepticism based on the Cochrane review by Lundh et al 2017 https://t.co/UjI4e8T5BE https://t.co/xdhNKObosX
@JeanneLenzer1 @First10EM @SZehtabchi @thenntgroup @DrHowieMell Conclusion on fCOI and bias published in Cochrane 2017 https://t.co/UjI4e8T5BE https://t.co/LgljMUvZHf
@JeanneLenzer1 The bias that fCOI can introduce in to research,m has been reported. https://t.co/UjI4e8T5BE @First10EM @SZehtabchi @thenntgroup @DrHowieMell
@First10EM @ericadmckenzie @MicieliA_MD @EddyLang1 @mihill68 @noreenkamal @srrezaie @Rick_Pescatore @ericadmckenzie There's a Cochrane review on COI for RCTs. I suggest you look at the included trials in the SRMA. Pointing out COIs isn't an ad hominem at
RT @v_margar: 7/νόμιμο κ παράνομο.Τα κράτη ας κάνουν το καθήκον τους να προστατεύουν τους πολιτες γιατι καλώς ή κακώς οι big pharma είναι ε…
7/νόμιμο κ παράνομο.Τα κράτη ας κάνουν το καθήκον τους να προστατεύουν τους πολιτες γιατι καλώς ή κακώς οι big pharma είναι εντελώς απαραίτητες για να επιβιώσουμε. Ενδεικτικες πηγές: https://t.co/o4At76mKyQ. https://t.co/Xn0l4UIr28 https://t.co/RaqOF8fTOp
Industry sponsorship & research outcome https://t.co/vbOEAKiYAt @AndreasLundh2 et al #clinicaltrials #COI
"Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than sponsorship by other sources."—@CochraneLibrary https://t.co/huQkKtgTGz
"Le parrainage des études portant sur des médicaments par les sociétés produisant ceux‐ci conduit à des résultats en matière d'efficacité et à des conclusions plus favorables par rapport au parrainage provenant d'autres sources."—@CochraneLibrary https://t
Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/ztHd47B3U0
RT @sylvangui: Corruption épistémique, industrie pharmaceutique et corps de la science médicale https://t.co/Zo16BQDbPb Le parrainage indu…
RT @sylvangui: Corruption épistémique, industrie pharmaceutique et corps de la science médicale https://t.co/Zo16BQDbPb Le parrainage indu…
étude d'impact du parrainage industriel sur le résultats à partir de 8000 publications. Résultat: quel que soit le niveau de l'étude, il y a un biais en faveur des produits financés de +27% Que font les états pour reprendre la main? https://t.co/DHqvcssmY
@ebtapper @rbganatra there's also this: https://t.co/qIyxzpP8jJ
"Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than sponsorship by other sources. "
Industry sponsorship and research outcome - | Cochrane Library https://t.co/Z1qdghWYab
@meganranney @DrCastner Link to the Cochrane SRMA on COI from 2017 https://t.co/Rc6fRdMZJ7
RT @JuanGrvas: Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions…
RT @JuanGrvas: Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions…
RT @JuanGrvas: Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions…
Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than sponsorship by other sources. #ConlaIndustriaNO Quien patrocina, influye. También en investigación. Revisiones Cochrane. https
Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than sponsorship by other sources. #ConlaIndustriaNO Quien patrocina, influye. También en investigación. Revisiones Cochrane. https
RT @DocsWoSponsors: @AndreasLundh2 and colleagues showed in a @cochranecollab review: https://t.co/occIrk5KL8 - that industry sponsored s…
RT @DocsWoSponsors: @AndreasLundh2 and colleagues showed in a @cochranecollab review: https://t.co/occIrk5KL8 - that industry sponsored s…
@AndreasLundh2 and colleagues showed in a @cochranecollab review: https://t.co/occIrk5KL8 - that industry sponsored studies more often had favorable efficacy results: Risk ratio 1.27 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.17 to 1.37 #DoctorsWithoutSponsor
Here's a Cochrane review from 2017 Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/01Z1nYsgKD Key: "Our analyses suggest the existence of an industry bias that cannot be explained by standard 'Risk of bias' assessments."
RT @pash22: Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions th…
Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than sponsorship by other sources https://t.co/g3Ln3azgyY via @joel_lexchin & @AndreasLundh2 et al @barttels2
@GreggWStone @VictorDayan1 @AbbottCardio @NEJM @BBCNewsnight The Cochrane library has a very informative review on the subject, updated in 2017 https://t.co/yeSo2wLRW0
@KKrapok @SimonSutcliff @lemondefr Ici une analyse d'un consortium indépendant comparant les études et leurs méthodologies. https://t.co/adrdiEjlCq
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
👇👇👇💥💥
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
RT @DoctorChrisVT: The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and number…
The hand of Gilead is heavy here - we know that when studies (and remember this isn’t a study it’s just words and numbers) are funded by industry (even when they are well designed) find in favour of the drugs more often than independent studies. https://t.
Industry sponsorship and research outcome - Lundh, A - 2017 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/IL64Wp0XmA
@VipinZamvar @RCSEd @TaviFeb @STS_CTsurgery @SCTSUK @JournalCTSurg https://t.co/rC9FKeE9yy. Cochrane’s view is quite the opposite.
RT @lovereignssupr1: BREAKING-- "when people are paid to do stuff... they do it."
BREAKING-- "when people are paid to do stuff... they do it."
Not surprised. Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/woMpNUodTE
@mbrockwa @mamasbelle @mamabear_ca @oneworldbirth @MeghanAzad @Dr_LarsBode @FriendsofWHOCod @babymilkaction @HIFN12 It’s a common belief that education allows people to navigate data but that belief is contradicted by robust evidence which shows that the b
a principale rivista medica sta lanciando una campagna globale per separare la medicina dalle grandi industrie farmaceutiche, collegando l'influenza dell'industria allo scandalo della rete... https://t.co/JAKHVVe4az
RT @XS2Mind: Een mooie oproep in het @bmj_latest om commerciële invloeden in medische publicaties te verminderen. Alles komt open te liggen…
"... research has found that pharmaceutical industry sponsored studies tend to favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies with any other sources of sponsorship. This suggests that industry sponsored studies are biased in favor of the sponsor’s products."
RT @libertylives277: #pharma #Industry and influence on #science and #outcomes https://t.co/1bHtNUnyMz
Industry sponsored drug and device studies more often had efficacy results that were favorable to the sponsors' products, (risk ratio (RR): 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17 to 1.37) https://t.co/sd7bKz9bpk
Previous research has found that pharmaceutical industry sponsored studies tend to favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies with any other sources of sponsorship. https://t.co/tIq6XocBP5
RT @MasahiroBanno: 「企業の資金提供と研究の結果」に関するコクランレビュー要約日本語訳が公開されました。医薬品や医療機器の有効性・副作用を対象とした、企業からの資金提供を受けた研究論文を読むときには、結果と結論が一致しているか否か確認することが重要であることが…
RT @MasahiroBanno: 「企業の資金提供と研究の結果」に関するコクランレビュー要約日本語訳が公開されました。医薬品や医療機器の有効性・副作用を対象とした、企業からの資金提供を受けた研究論文を読むときには、結果と結論が一致しているか否か確認することが重要であることが…
RT @MasahiroBanno: 「企業の資金提供と研究の結果」に関するコクランレビュー要約日本語訳が公開されました。医薬品や医療機器の有効性・副作用を対象とした、企業からの資金提供を受けた研究論文を読むときには、結果と結論が一致しているか否か確認することが重要であることが…
RT @MasahiroBanno: 「企業の資金提供と研究の結果」に関するコクランレビュー要約日本語訳が公開されました。医薬品や医療機器の有効性・副作用を対象とした、企業からの資金提供を受けた研究論文を読むときには、結果と結論が一致しているか否か確認することが重要であることが…
"In industry sponsored studies, there was less agreement between the results and the conclusions than in non-industry sponsored studies" https://t.co/ritFcqDJmt
Not surprisingly, industry sponsorship can influence research outcome https://t.co/4VK3VpNvex
Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/MJ6VcGGXwO
#pharma #Industry and influence on #science and #outcomes https://t.co/1bHtNUnyMz
RT @AnnBoni1: This article is stating the obvious Mesh injured patients have known the research involving mesh manufacturers is biased in t…
RT @AnnBoni1: This article is stating the obvious Mesh injured patients have known the research involving mesh manufacturers is biased in t…
RT @AnnBoni1: This article is stating the obvious Mesh injured patients have known the research involving mesh manufacturers is biased in t…
Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/dZLZcjxmXV
RT @XS2Mind: Een mooie oproep in het @bmj_latest om commerciële invloeden in medische publicaties te verminderen. Alles komt open te liggen…
Een mooie oproep in het @bmj_latest om commerciële invloeden in medische publicaties te verminderen. Alles komt open te liggen in deze tijd. Heel mooi. En eindelijk! https://t.co/RNrAKfo137 Het @CochraneSweden meldde dit al eerder: https://t.co/XeHy462r
RT @AnnBoni1: This article is stating the obvious Mesh injured patients have known the research involving mesh manufacturers is biased in t…
RT @AnnBoni1: This article is stating the obvious Mesh injured patients have known the research involving mesh manufacturers is biased in t…
RT @AnnBoni1: This article is stating the obvious Mesh injured patients have known the research involving mesh manufacturers is biased in t…
RT @AnnBoni1: This article is stating the obvious Mesh injured patients have known the research involving mesh manufacturers is biased in t…