This article is stating the obvious Mesh injured patients have known the research involving mesh manufacturers is biased in their favour @gina_knows @SusanMorgan19 @BevHolt1 @alisonmawright @karen40n @IMMDSReview @chrisharding123 @electric_11 @gina_knows
In health, industry sponsored research is biased in favour of industry. What about GISERA, funded by, and intimately connected with Big Gas (in CSIRO). What goes on there? #fracking https://t.co/IHiW6oSUYy
「企業の資金提供と研究の結果」に関するコクランレビュー要約日本語訳が公開されました。医薬品や医療機器の有効性・副作用を対象とした、企業からの資金提供を受けた研究論文を読むときには、結果と結論が一致しているか否か確認することが重要であることが分かりました。 https://t.co/rMnu7DUc8p
Este aspecto tampoco ha cambiado, los estudios patrocinados por la industria tienen mayor probabilidad de ser positivos. https://t.co/AYHkCQgS6k
En este sentido, una revisión de 75 estudios publicada en el Cochrane Systematic Review mostró que la financiación de la industria se asoció con conclusiones de ensayos positivos y resultados estadísticamente significativos más frecuentes https://t.co/cntF
@EAllen0417 Really? I was talking about this in drug studies: https://t.co/nwyRojlFhp And this is nutrition: https://t.co/S1iFXBa7yp Where’s the 90% from?
@le_science4all Parce que j'en parlais au détours d'une discussion avec des pirates sur les effets des financements privés, je me permets de partager cet extrait sur la pre-registration https://t.co/OSSW2o1D2Y Et merci pour cette toute première rencontre
@DrAshaSub @PCRM @DrNealBarnard Ow boohoo, they are activists besides being scientists. Make sure you take extra precautions https://t.co/gMp9UMo0Kw
Always ask if a #tobacco company funded research you are reviewing - "Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than sponsorship by other sources.” https://t.co/ZHXGjZpoYY
RT @GlobalHealthNut: Vital for ALL involved in research (or interpretation of research) to know this... https://t.co/CdMNdOAqxA
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/vME83X8uMb
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @SimonCapewell99: #Industry funded #research BIASES #science CORRUPTS #policy advice MT @martinmckee @ModiMwatsama @MIALONMelissa @pet…
RT @SimonCapewell99: #Industry funded #research BIASES #science CORRUPTS #policy advice MT @martinmckee @ModiMwatsama @MIALONMelissa @pet…
#Industry funded #research BIASES #science CORRUPTS #policy advice MT @martinmckee @ModiMwatsama @MIALONMelissa @petticrewmark @spidermaani @CecileKnai @PHE_uk https://t.co/mN2CQufy6d
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @GlobalHealthNut: Vital for ALL involved in research (or interpretation of research) to know this... https://t.co/CdMNdOAqxA
Vital for ALL involved in research (or interpretation of research) to know this...
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/9uCP5jZb2A
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
RT @martinmckee: Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence i…
Fascinated by how @iealondon keep insisting that funding source has no impact on findings when there is so much evidence it does. https://t.co/NPBum9Y3hl https://t.co/pZM185Jszo
RT @pash22: Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/gYYlnWhhix via @CochraneLibrary
RT @pash22: Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/gYYlnWhhix via @CochraneLibrary
Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/gYYlnWhhix via @CochraneLibrary
RT @MaritaHennessy: Industry sponsorship & research outcome [2017, Cochrane review] https://t.co/vbOEAKiYAt #COI
Industry sponsorship & research outcome [2017, Cochrane review] https://t.co/vbOEAKiYAt #COI
@CathalGuiomard In my own area, there's a lot of evidence that clinical trials funded by drug companies are more likely to report positive results. Humans are very easy to bias! https://t.co/BpG4ymIZyx
@nick_krontiris @kevinnbass Its also Cochrane's bias then as well, How can you twist this to bias? Even fables talk of "Letting the fox guard the hen house" https://t.co/2OUMnggv6K
業界のスポンサーシップと研究成果 https://t.co/YDTxJuL1FQ
Industry sponsorship and research outcome. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/VN05o84LsZ
@Dr_Maria_Brink @catvetsusan @WinnFeline Several systematic reviews have documented that pharmaceutical industry sponsorship of drug studies is associated with findings that are favorable to the sponsor’s product (Bekelman 2003; Lexchin 2003; Schott 2010a;
@ChomasChomas @ViborgKarsten @BrixAnja @SSTSundhed Et link til PubMed kan ikke ligestilles med en koncentreret liste jeg linker til, håndplukket udelukkende vedr. HPV-vaccinen. Og ja, det er yderst sjældent man får brugbar forskning når der ikke er interes
@ChomasChomas @ViborgKarsten @BrixAnja @SSTSundhed Nej, det er klart. Medicinalindustri-forskning er virkelig der hvor kredibiliteten en ligger, ikke i uafhængig forskning samt forskere. https://t.co/Ckb9xfvNoF https://t.co/hTtZRHb46M Hvis du kan finde ud
RT @M1leondelrio: Los estudios financiados por la industria farmaceutica favorecen los medicamentos que ellas mismas fabrican en detrimento…
RT @M1leondelrio: Los estudios financiados por la industria farmaceutica favorecen los medicamentos que ellas mismas fabrican en detrimento…
RT @M1leondelrio: Los estudios financiados por la industria farmaceutica favorecen los medicamentos que ellas mismas fabrican en detrimento…
Los estudios financiados por la industria farmaceutica favorecen los medicamentos que ellas mismas fabrican en detrimento de los estudios de investigadores independientes https://t.co/xRd7vk8DkD
Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions than sponsorship by other sources. https://t.co/snDXHTkpTl
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
Bias? 🤔 #BigPharma https://t.co/r8hMkW2tRu
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
It seems obvious, but is often forgotten. Big Pharma manipulates data to make money. Read ‘Bad Pharma’, by the ever-entertaining & always-erudite @bengoldacre https://t.co/VPS35Okuya
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
RT @MaryanneDemasi: Cochrane 2017: Pharma industry sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources ht…
@MaryanneDemasi @ProfDFrancis @LDLSkeptic @zoeharcombe @bigfatsurprise @davidludwigmd @ProfTimNoakes @JeffryGerberMD @KetoCarnivore @malcolmken @DrAseemMalhotra This is why it is absolutely essential for the raw data to be open to inspection by people who
@HygieneMentale Bonjour, intéressante vidéo, bravo ! Juste une remarque sur les conflits d'intérêt : la taille des cohortes n'est pas un facteur explicatif satisfaisant : https://t.co/bKagxR3Bto Pour plus d'info, il y a cette synthèse de @cochranecollab :
@NAChristakis I'll respectfully disagree w/rt "evidence-based," which has become virtually meaningless in a world in which this is true: https://t.co/s20bYFhAxx
Finansowanie badań: wpływ na publikowane wyniki, wnioski lub ryzyko błędu badań klinicznych dotyczących leków i... https://t.co/0JOpsjCmKr
Analyses suggest the existence of an industry bias that cannot be explained by standard 'Risk of bias' assessments https://t.co/JLD2DVvtFQ
Industry sponsorship and research outcome. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/8TEb9Ge4J1
Always look for the funder. Beware esp govt & commercial interests. See: Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/aCPryfl5C5
These studies dominate the "evidence base" used by industry-funded docs to write clinical practice guidelines. @VernersViews https://t.co/f7eGv2BbZl
Industry sponsorship and research outcome | Cochrane https://t.co/Q1R01JKQg6
RT @dompagano: And the design is bespoke to the purpose https://t.co/g50LptY03a
RT @dompagano: And the design is bespoke to the purpose https://t.co/g50LptY03a
RT @dompagano: And the design is bespoke to the purpose https://t.co/g50LptY03a
RT @rafasadaba: Sponsorship of studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions https://t.co/…
And the design is bespoke to the purpose https://t.co/g50LptY03a
Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable results @cochranecollab https://t.co/5WP0eW7p91
RT @rafasadaba: Sponsorship of studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions https://t.co/…
Sponsorship of studies by the manufacturing company leads to more favorable efficacy results and conclusions https://t.co/82960vrDFN
企業がスポンサーだと自社の薬、装置に有利な結果を報告し、結果と結論の一致が低い。コクランレビュー。Industry sponsorship and research outcome https://t.co/3bXjQ8T07V
RT @therealarnav: Research study #sponsorship & #funding by #pharma & #industry drives #bias & #inconsistency in results/conclusions. https…
Research study #sponsorship & #funding by #pharma & #industry drives #bias & #inconsistency in results/conclusions. https://t.co/BwrNnFyQpo https://t.co/gwJJuFjC7O
Cochrane 2017: #Pharma #industry #sponsored studies favor the sponsors’ drugs more than studies funded by other sources. #COI #funding. https://t.co/UERH6oiyEj
RT @fatisourfriend: Sad, but not surprising: "Sponsorship of drug & device studies by the manufacturing company = more favorable efficacy r…
اغلب دراسات الأدوية ترعاها الصناعات الدوائية ... https://t.co/oTajSLtQC6