| Title |
Antithrombotic therapy for improving maternal or infant health outcomes in women considered at risk of placental dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006780.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodie M Dodd, Anne McLeod, Rory C Windrim, John Kingdom |
| Abstract |
Pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction and placental abruption are thought to have a common origin related to abnormalities in the development and function of the placenta. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 23% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 67 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2014.
All research outputs
#21,011,775
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,240
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,466
of 210,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#226
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.