↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus late administration of amino acids in preterm infants receiving parenteral nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Early versus late administration of amino acids in preterm infants receiving parenteral nutrition
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008771.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit Trivedi, John KH Sinn

Abstract

Observational studies in preterm newborns suggest that delay in administering amino acids could result in a protein catabolic state and could impact on growth and development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 198 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 15 7%
Other 44 22%
Unknown 42 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Unspecified 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 50 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,663,459
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,911
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,323
of 208,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#218
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.