The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Early versus late administration of amino acids in preterm infants receiving parenteral nutrition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008771.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amit Trivedi, John KH Sinn |
| Abstract |
Observational studies in preterm newborns suggest that delay in administering amino acids could result in a protein catabolic state and could impact on growth and development. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2013.
All research outputs
#21,378,207
of 26,240,084 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,293
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,988
of 210,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#225
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,240,084 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.