| Title |
Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and perioperative bleeding in paediatric tonsillectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003591.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon R Lewis, Amanda Nicholson, Mary E Cardwell, Gretchen Siviter, Andrew F Smith |
| Abstract |
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used for pain relief following tonsillectomy in children. However, as they inhibit platelet aggregation and prolong bleeding time they could cause increased perioperative bleeding. The overall risk remains unclear. This review was originally published in 2005 and was updated in 2010 and in 2012. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 29% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 69 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 87 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,609,245
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,436
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,532
of 208,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.