↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
57 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006920.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying C Cheong, Sarah Dix, Ernest Hung Yu Ng, William L Ledger, Cindy Farquhar

Abstract

Acupuncture is commonly undertaken during an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle although its role in improving live birth and pregnancy rates is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 297 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 17%
Student > Bachelor 46 15%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Other 20 7%
Other 59 20%
Unknown 67 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Psychology 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 76 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#391,896
of 23,050,116 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#705
of 12,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,031
of 198,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,050,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.