↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
58 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006920.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying C Cheong, Sarah Dix, Ernest Hung Yu Ng, William L Ledger, Cindy Farquhar

Abstract

Acupuncture is commonly undertaken during an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle although its role in improving live birth and pregnancy rates is unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 338 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 17%
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Researcher 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Other 22 6%
Other 72 21%
Unknown 85 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 9%
Unspecified 16 5%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 94 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2024.
All research outputs
#461,203
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#807
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,278
of 210,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.