↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
67 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006920.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying C Cheong, Sarah Dix, Ernest Hung Yu Ng, William L Ledger, Cindy Farquhar

Abstract

Acupuncture is commonly undertaken during an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle although its role in improving live birth and pregnancy rates is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 265 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 17%
Student > Master 47 17%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 20 7%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 52 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 59 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#278,677
of 18,956,214 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#539
of 11,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,315
of 170,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,956,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.