| Title |
Interventions (other than pharmacological, psychosocial or psychological) for treating antenatal depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006795.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cindy-Lee Dennis, Therese Dowswell |
| Abstract |
A meta-analysis of 21 studies suggests the mean prevalence rate for depression across the antenatal period is 10.7%, ranging from 7.4% in the first trimester to a high of 12.8% in the second trimester. Due to maternal treatment preferences and potential concerns about fetal and infant health outcomes, diverse non-pharmacological treatment options are needed. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 458 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 91 | 20% |
| Researcher | 53 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 75 | 16% |
| Unknown | 130 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 24% |
| Psychology | 65 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 11% |
| Unknown | 145 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,221,997
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,808
of 12,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,952
of 199,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.