↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nitrates for acute heart failure syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Nitrates for acute heart failure syndromes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005151.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abel Wakai, Aileen McCabe, Rachel Kidney, Steven C Brooks, Rawle A Seupaul, Deborah B Diercks, Nigel Salter, Gregory J Fermann, Caroline Pospisil

Abstract

Current drug therapy for acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) consists mainly of diuretics supplemented by vasodilators or inotropes. Nitrates have been used as vasodilators in AHFS for many years and have been shown to improve some aspects of AHFS in some small studies. The aim of this review was to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of nitrate vasodilators in AHFS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 214 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 51 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Psychology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 60 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,007,090
of 14,195,619 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,989
of 10,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,580
of 156,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,195,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.