The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Enemas during labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000330.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ludovic Reveiz, Hernando G Gaitán, Luis Gabriel Cuervo |
| Abstract |
Although the use of enemas during labour usually reflects the preference of the attending healthcare provider, enemas may cause discomfort for women. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 25% |
| Croatia | 1 | 5% |
| Serbia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 20% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,187,847
of 26,337,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,426
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,768
of 211,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,337,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.