↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enemas during labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Enemas during labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000330.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludovic Reveiz, Hernando G Gaitán, Luis Gabriel Cuervo

Abstract

Although the use of enemas during labour usually reflects the preference of the attending healthcare provider, enemas may cause discomfort for women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 46 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 21%
Psychology 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 53 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,007,294
of 25,376,646 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,305
of 13,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,592
of 205,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.