↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enemas during labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Enemas during labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000330.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reveiz, Ludovic, Gaitán, Hernando G, Cuervo, Luis Gabriel

Abstract

Although the use of enemas during labour usually reflects the preference of the attending healthcare provider, enemas may cause discomfort for women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 19%
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 23%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 26 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,712,398
of 19,032,591 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,060
of 11,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,331
of 170,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,032,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.