↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007088.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Michele Rossi, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

The management of people at high risk of perioperative death due to their general condition (high-risk surgical patients) with acute calculous cholecystitis is controversial, with no clear guidelines. In particular, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in these patients has not been defined.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Other 18 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 51 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,211,255
of 22,570,871 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,051
of 12,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,978
of 177,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,570,871 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.