| Title |
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007088.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Michele Rossi, Brian R Davidson |
| Abstract |
The management of people at high risk of perioperative death due to their general condition (high-risk surgical patients) with acute calculous cholecystitis is controversial, with no clear guidelines. In particular, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in these patients has not been defined. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 48 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,351,041
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,168
of 12,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,854
of 198,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.