↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007088.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Michele Rossi, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

The management of people at high risk of perioperative death due to their general condition (high-risk surgical patients) with acute calculous cholecystitis is controversial, with no clear guidelines. In particular, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in these patients has not been defined.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 17 10%
Other 41 25%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 40 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,025,512
of 18,144,179 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,363
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,362
of 168,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,144,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.