↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high‐risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high‐risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007088.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Michele Rossi, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

The management of people at high risk of perioperative death due to their general condition (high-risk surgical patients) with acute calculous cholecystitis is controversial, with no clear guidelines. In particular, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in these patients has not been defined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 218 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 11%
Other 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Researcher 20 9%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 57 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 71 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,236,093
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,304
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,947
of 209,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.