↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, and lower esophagus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, and lower esophagus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008107.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Matthias Schwarzbach, Ralf Hofheinz, Peter Kienle, Meinhard Kieser, Tracy E Slanger, Katrin Jensen

Abstract

The outcome of patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal (GE) junction, and stomach) is poor. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on survival and other outcomes.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 182 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 51 28%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 35 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,863,737
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,356
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,013
of 168,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.