↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012570
Authors

Liang Jin Li, Yu Jie Chen, Gan Mi Wang, Wen Lu Tang, James M Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,664,346
of 16,031,109 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,351
of 11,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,877
of 262,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#183
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,031,109 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.