↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006810.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Cruciani, Benjamin A Lipsky, Carlo Mengoli, Fausto de Lalla

Abstract

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases the release of neutrophil endothelial progenitor cells from the bone marrow and improves neutrophil functions, which are often impaired in people with diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 21 12%
Other 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 46 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 56 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,139,188
of 18,187,474 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,510
of 11,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,306
of 171,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,187,474 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.