↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006810.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Cruciani, Benjamin A Lipsky, Carlo Mengoli, Fausto de Lalla

Abstract

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases the release of neutrophil endothelial progenitor cells from the bone marrow and improves neutrophil functions, which are often impaired in people with diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 213 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Researcher 23 11%
Other 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 79 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 88 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,729
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,615
of 209,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#172
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.